OK, it looks like we are going up against Barack Hussein Obama (from here on out reffered to lovingly as "Hoos") and I pray to God and all that is holy that I am right about all presidential elections being decided in advance because if not we are truly fucked if he wins. He is so off the wall crazy that I can't even see how anybody but the most Liberal of Liberals can support him.
I won't get into how he has no experience whatsoever, that he has outlined exactly zero plans as to what he is going to do if he gets elected, or that all we (widely) know he stands for is "change", whatever change may mean. I won't get into the fact that he aligned himself with a church that is about as militant as some of the mosques I dealt with in Iraq, or that his wife, who Hoos has whored out to the media for his benefit but nobody can talk badly about, went on record as saying that she, in her adult life, has never been proud of America until now.
I won't get into any of that. What I will get into is some of what he really believes and some of the incredible tactics he uses to get a leg up.
Never before have we had such a debutant running for office. Hoos has successfully positioned himself that nobody is allowed to question the words and actions of himself, his family, or his friends, without being accused of being a racist or playing dirty politics. Never before have we seen an individual running for public office being "off-limits" to criticism, yet he slings accusations and criticism around like a monkey slings shit. No that wasn't a racial comment but it's the only animal I know of that flings shit around except the two disgusting bitches in the"two girls one cup" video.
Here is just a couple examples of the endless accusations and "butt-hurtery" that Hoos employs.
Just copy and paste the two lines, the address were too long and went off the side
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/
BD5395C4-0AD3-496C-BD1C-94FFFB3950F4.htm
Please note who this is from and the purely unbiased quote from Rob Reynolds of. Also please not how they call Hoos the "US Democratic presidential hopeful" while McCain is "The presumptive Republican candidate." Are they retarded? McCain hasn't been "presumptive" in months and last I heard Hoos still didn't have the nod. Very unbiased and oh so accurate.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/
article/2008/03/09/AR2008030902005.html
More Vagisil for the distinguished gentleman from Illinois please.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=
D90MRLLG0&show_article=1
I guess when you allude to somebody's actual beliefs they don't like that.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5itzEF
e8o5QDV0EFCZG6ZJDbJwdLQD90HQJSG2
Calling him a senile old man is how you can read this one. But please don't bring up Hoos' young age or lack of experience because that would be a "deceitful attack, aimed at driving America apart."
I could go on and on but I don't have time on particular subject. Just google "Obama-accuses" and you will get 137,000 matches. GO ahead and put it in for McCain and you will get a whopping 7,740 matches. Even the siren who woos people with false promises and political manipulation the likes of which hadn't been seen out side of her husband, and now far surpassed by Hoos, only had 32,000 matches. A little side note, it seems a lot like Dems really enjoy accusing people and wallowing in how unfair the world is. Makes sense why they have the backers that they do.
On to what Hoos actually believes.
Here is an example of how truly little he knows about the world. Iran and N. Korea are apparently not threats:
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/6801
And for a bit lest go to Hoos' website under the "Issues" tab.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/homeland/
In homeland security he talks about evacuating special needs people in the case of an attack... aaaaand... he talks about improving security around water facilities. Perhaps some more cameras will help. Aaaaand he talks about tracking spent nuclear fuel. Aaaaaand that's about it. No mention of perhaps taking out terrorists before they actually do anything, no talk of dealing with countries that fund terrorism. But I tell ya what when we get bombed again the rescue vehicles will have a wheel chair ramp.
Hoos' plan on immigration
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/immigration/
So here he wants to add more people to the border which doesn't really help when they border patrol is too scared to do anything because the drug runners out gun them and are willing to use the guns, and ummmm, let's see, give lots of money to Mexico to make life less shitty there. Hmm, oh, crack down on employers who hire illegals, which will last until Wal-Mart and all the other huge conglomerates give him a call on the Bat-Phone and say "yeah if you like your job you need to knock that shit off."
Environment
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/
Pay for "every ton of emissions" which we can go ahead and equate to huge price increases on pretty much everything. He wants to give tax payer money to farmers who plant trees. Very nice. Umm, 15 billion a year for 10 years for clean energy type stuff, to include bio-fuels, which, my most green of green friends said is an absolute tub of shit. Double government spending of R&D for renewable resources. See also "raise taxes". Seems to me that the private sector is best suited for that. I have a friend who works at a solar panel plant and you would be shocked at the stuff they have going. He wants to "convert our manufacturing centers into clean technology leaders" Require 25% clean energy by 2025 (please see gargantuan government) yadda yadda, it goes on.
Here is one of my favorites.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/disabilities/
"End discrimination and promote equal opportunity." End discrimination? Is that all? And how exactly do... oh never mind.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/iraq/
"Obama will immediately begin to withdraw our troops from Iraq." yeah, umm, that's a really bad idea. Trust me on that one. Read the rest. It's all pretty retarded and won't work.
His whole site is full of stuff that really doesn't say much about how he plans on doing anything. He has an outline but that's about it.
The only good thing about this whole bit is that the Clintons are done in politics. Their "good friends" abandoned them like rats off a sinking ship. Michael Moore, Famed Haliburton investor, calls Hillary "down right disgusting" now where as he and Bill used to chase tail together.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/21/michael-
moore-endorses-obama-chastises-clinton-as-downright-disgusting/all-comments/
And of course the black community who so loved Billy and and dubbed him the "first black president", after all, he did play sax on the Arsenio Hall Show, have taken his brother status away and have actually called the honkies from Arkansas racist. Who would have thunk it?
Anyway, running out of time so let me sum up. He wants dialog with N. Korea and Iran as if he will somehow make them see the error of their ways. He wants to raise taxes, increase the size of our government, and weaken our military, both by finances and tactics, to the point of uselessness. Not once has he actually laid out a plan as to how he plans to actually do this stuff. My guess is because they pretty much all involve raising taxes.
I will leave you with a nice little quote from Hoos yesterday.
"We can't drive our SUVs,and you know, eat as much as we want, and keep our homes on, ya know, 72 degrees at all times, whether we're living in the desert or living in the tundra, and then just expect that every other country is just gonna say OK."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMJyFKuKqck
Since when do Cambodians and French people determine what I drive, eat, or keep my home at? Then, by the way, his three SUV motorcade took him off to his next appointment. Will he demand to be driven around in a Prius? This is akin to Al Gore talking about wasteful emissions then taking off in his private jet. It's all a joke people. He's a snake oil salesman who is playing with our money, security, and lives. There will be celebrations in Tehran and Damascus if he wins. That's not a good thing in case you were wondering. At least Hillary knows what is out there. I truly can't find one good thing to say about him. Sorry Yah, I tried.
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Truggers are screwing us
I hate hippies. There... I said it. These damned tree hugger (truggers) have gotten us, America, in such bad shape that we actually IMPORT wheat. Wheat... America now imports wheat. While we once grew enough wheat to feed the world, we now have to import it because we are now growing corn for ethanol, one of the biggest shams of all time.
http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=435631
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9QQcP_Y1II
In 2005 our president and our congress decided to mandate an increase of production of Ethanol from 4 billion gallons a year to 7.5 billion gallons which means that we will have to hijack even more farm land to grow corn or other Ethanol crops. Combine that with the fact that it isn't even proven that Ethanol is actually more energy efficient due to the high energy costs it takes to make it, we have to wonder what in the hell is going through the little green minds of those in charge. Please note the high tariff on any that is imported, just to make sure we have to make it here.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12872060/
Now, for those of you (Peter) who don't believe in my conspiracy type ideas that most everything that happens is all a play by those who pull the strings, ask yourself why a president who is the bane of the existence (in theory) of everything environmental, would push so hard for this? Keep in mind that ADM (Arthur, Daniels, Midland) "The supermarket to the world" is running this little game of charades. One of the biggest underwriters of NPR, who hates the pres, is working hand in hand with both Reps and Dems to be green. Bush, Romney, McCain, Obama, Clinton, Edwards, all back it but they can't come up with any proof of the claims Ethanol makes. What can I say? It brings in the votes from the same people that mindlessly watch the evening news, believe what they see, and consider themselves informed. If ADM couldn't make more money with Ethanol, would they do it? Of course not.
The following link brings up a good point: If Ethanol is so great why does it need so many government subsidies and a stiff arm from all the political high-ups to force people to grow crops for it? If it really worked wouldn't the market naturally gravitate towards it? By the way, more crops growing means more water, land, and fertilizer is spent on them.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/05/the_many_myths_of_ethanol.html
Now you have all read, I hope, my blogs on environmentalism in the past and you know I think it is nothing but a way to get money from people with soft hearts. It would seem that in this case this Ethanol stuff is a way to get tax dollars stuffed into the pockets of those producing it without the nasty little thorn in the side of a free market economy or, in fact, even having a product that works.
Another nice little side effect of the Ethanol craze is increased corn prices and hunger in places like Mexico where corn is their main staple. Increased corn prices pretty much increases the price on anything associated with corn, from milk to Pepsi. The CNN article that follows admits to all this but says we shouldn't worry. After all, it will calm down in the future. With government mandated increases for ethanol the only way to lower corn prices would be to increase the supply which would, if I'm not mistaking, would require growing more corn and less other stuff. No matter what we do prices will go up across the board. It's pure supply and demand.
And finally, guess how Ethanol is transported... By truck. And my guess is that that truck burns dinosaur bones, not corn. So I wonder what the "carbon footprint" is for
a gallon of Ethanol between the immense amount of energy it takes to make it and the incredible energy cost of transportation.
http://www.agmrc.org/NR/rdonlyres/4EE0E81C-C607-4C3F-BBCF-B75B7395C881/0/ksupipelineethl.pdf
So what do I say to the truggers who buy into this? Shame on you. Do some homework. What do I say to the Ethanol CEOs who I'm sure don't really give a shit about the environment? Good on ya. You have a great scam going and if I could have gotten in on it I most certainly would have.
http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=435631
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9QQcP_Y1II
In 2005 our president and our congress decided to mandate an increase of production of Ethanol from 4 billion gallons a year to 7.5 billion gallons which means that we will have to hijack even more farm land to grow corn or other Ethanol crops. Combine that with the fact that it isn't even proven that Ethanol is actually more energy efficient due to the high energy costs it takes to make it, we have to wonder what in the hell is going through the little green minds of those in charge. Please note the high tariff on any that is imported, just to make sure we have to make it here.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12872060/
Now, for those of you (Peter) who don't believe in my conspiracy type ideas that most everything that happens is all a play by those who pull the strings, ask yourself why a president who is the bane of the existence (in theory) of everything environmental, would push so hard for this? Keep in mind that ADM (Arthur, Daniels, Midland) "The supermarket to the world" is running this little game of charades. One of the biggest underwriters of NPR, who hates the pres, is working hand in hand with both Reps and Dems to be green. Bush, Romney, McCain, Obama, Clinton, Edwards, all back it but they can't come up with any proof of the claims Ethanol makes. What can I say? It brings in the votes from the same people that mindlessly watch the evening news, believe what they see, and consider themselves informed. If ADM couldn't make more money with Ethanol, would they do it? Of course not.
The following link brings up a good point: If Ethanol is so great why does it need so many government subsidies and a stiff arm from all the political high-ups to force people to grow crops for it? If it really worked wouldn't the market naturally gravitate towards it? By the way, more crops growing means more water, land, and fertilizer is spent on them.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/05/the_many_myths_of_ethanol.html
Now you have all read, I hope, my blogs on environmentalism in the past and you know I think it is nothing but a way to get money from people with soft hearts. It would seem that in this case this Ethanol stuff is a way to get tax dollars stuffed into the pockets of those producing it without the nasty little thorn in the side of a free market economy or, in fact, even having a product that works.
Another nice little side effect of the Ethanol craze is increased corn prices and hunger in places like Mexico where corn is their main staple. Increased corn prices pretty much increases the price on anything associated with corn, from milk to Pepsi. The CNN article that follows admits to all this but says we shouldn't worry. After all, it will calm down in the future. With government mandated increases for ethanol the only way to lower corn prices would be to increase the supply which would, if I'm not mistaking, would require growing more corn and less other stuff. No matter what we do prices will go up across the board. It's pure supply and demand.
And finally, guess how Ethanol is transported... By truck. And my guess is that that truck burns dinosaur bones, not corn. So I wonder what the "carbon footprint" is for
a gallon of Ethanol between the immense amount of energy it takes to make it and the incredible energy cost of transportation.
http://www.agmrc.org/NR/rdonlyres/4EE0E81C-C607-4C3F-BBCF-B75B7395C881/0/ksupipelineethl.pdf
So what do I say to the truggers who buy into this? Shame on you. Do some homework. What do I say to the Ethanol CEOs who I'm sure don't really give a shit about the environment? Good on ya. You have a great scam going and if I could have gotten in on it I most certainly would have.
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Your parents hate each other
Yup, I said it... Your parents hate each other. Don't deny it. You know it's true. If not hate, then at least can't stand. It was just today that I came to the following realization:
I know zero happily married couples. None, nada, zilch.
My favorite line of all unhappily married couples is "No marriage is perfect but ours is pretty good." Bull shit. That's like telling me getting kicked in the balls is never great but if you do it this way it isn't so bad.
I wish I could read minds. Not only would I make a killing at the poker tables but I would love to see all the nasty little secrets all the marriages have around me. I live in Ward and June Cleaver-Ville where everybody (except me) has 2.5 kids, a dog, and a beige house. Well, the beige house I have but not the kids or the dog, and everybody puts on this great facade but then forget that our houses are only millimeters apart and everyone can hear when they fight about him going out drinking with his buddies (which I whole heartedly support) and her banging the tennis pro. What in the hell is the point?
What are they trying to prove here?
We all know that marriage ends up with everybody involved miserable yet we always think we will be the ones to break the cycle. Are we that retarded. Thankfully I have never been sucked into the black hole of eternal monogamy, though it was a close call, and even though I always wanted a wife and 2.5 kids, recently I've really begun to question that. Think about it this way:
Scenario one is that you get married, you have kids (optional), get divorced, die
Scenario two is you get married, have kids (once again optional) stay married and be miserable, die.
Scenario three, the "best case scenario" get married, kids yadda yadda yadda, you live happily ever after, watch the love of your life die (or visa versa).
Or scenario four, stay single, fuck like a bunny, drink with your buddies, pray to God in heaven you don't add any more kids to this already overpopulated and pussified world, die happily, being shot to death at the age of 102 by a jealous husband.
I'll take scenario four thank you very much. I just don't think it's worth it anymore. Not that I can see anyway. To all of my married friends... best of luck on your journey, you'll need it. And don't raise you kids to be pussies or ass holes or I will be royally pissed. To all my buddies so wrapped up in vagina they have to sit down to piss, and plan on getting married, good luck to you too. I'm sure you will be the one to break the cycle and show the rest of us how the marriage game is played.
And oh yeah, if any of you can refute this, and say that marriage is a great thing and that it works, please, by all means try. But I will defend it with all the knowledge I have of your mom in the donkey show in Tijuana and your dad's cub scout fetish. Bring it on, Mr. Cleaver.
I know zero happily married couples. None, nada, zilch.
My favorite line of all unhappily married couples is "No marriage is perfect but ours is pretty good." Bull shit. That's like telling me getting kicked in the balls is never great but if you do it this way it isn't so bad.
I wish I could read minds. Not only would I make a killing at the poker tables but I would love to see all the nasty little secrets all the marriages have around me. I live in Ward and June Cleaver-Ville where everybody (except me) has 2.5 kids, a dog, and a beige house. Well, the beige house I have but not the kids or the dog, and everybody puts on this great facade but then forget that our houses are only millimeters apart and everyone can hear when they fight about him going out drinking with his buddies (which I whole heartedly support) and her banging the tennis pro. What in the hell is the point?
What are they trying to prove here?
We all know that marriage ends up with everybody involved miserable yet we always think we will be the ones to break the cycle. Are we that retarded. Thankfully I have never been sucked into the black hole of eternal monogamy, though it was a close call, and even though I always wanted a wife and 2.5 kids, recently I've really begun to question that. Think about it this way:
Scenario one is that you get married, you have kids (optional), get divorced, die
Scenario two is you get married, have kids (once again optional) stay married and be miserable, die.
Scenario three, the "best case scenario" get married, kids yadda yadda yadda, you live happily ever after, watch the love of your life die (or visa versa).
Or scenario four, stay single, fuck like a bunny, drink with your buddies, pray to God in heaven you don't add any more kids to this already overpopulated and pussified world, die happily, being shot to death at the age of 102 by a jealous husband.
I'll take scenario four thank you very much. I just don't think it's worth it anymore. Not that I can see anyway. To all of my married friends... best of luck on your journey, you'll need it. And don't raise you kids to be pussies or ass holes or I will be royally pissed. To all my buddies so wrapped up in vagina they have to sit down to piss, and plan on getting married, good luck to you too. I'm sure you will be the one to break the cycle and show the rest of us how the marriage game is played.
And oh yeah, if any of you can refute this, and say that marriage is a great thing and that it works, please, by all means try. But I will defend it with all the knowledge I have of your mom in the donkey show in Tijuana and your dad's cub scout fetish. Bring it on, Mr. Cleaver.
Saturday, February 16, 2008
The Holy Catholic Church and Self Love
OK people. Most of you know me and know that I am a student of religion. I study as much as I can about as many religions as I can in order to understand the whole deal better.
Now, that being said, I have hit upon some hard times lately and I don't have cable. In fact I have rabbit ears, which many of you born in the late '80's would have no idea about. Anyway, I only get a like 7 stations and one of those is EWTN (Eternal Word Television Network) a product of the Holy Roman Catholic Church.
To give you some back ground, I was born and raised Catholic. I went to Catholic school from 6th to 8th grade and, for the most part, I love the Church for it's history, tradition, and pageantry. Yes I know that it is propagating a fallacy, but you know what, that's OK by me. Most people blow them off when they get really out of line.
Anyway, I was watching this priest tonight who sounded a lot like Sean Connery. This guy went through the ten commandments (fifteen commandments if you have seen History of the World) and sure enough he got to the 6th commandment... Thou shall not commit adultery. And in true off the wall fashion, he included "impure thoughts" masturbation, and of course pre-marital sex as adultery. Guilty, guilty, and guilty. Now, my flock, these are "MORTAL SINS" which pretty much means if you ever saw a hot chick and said "Wow she's hot." or ever beat you meat, or ever shtoinked some chica you are pretty much going to hell unless you go and tell some 40year old virgin about it, ask for forgiveness, and say 30 Hail Mary's.
I can't even imagine that this ideology is still around. I mean, how ridiculous. To think that a natural human characteristic is a sin is baffling to me. This is the kind of shit that pisses me off. Granted, Catholics never tried to blow me up with an IED but this is still some shit I don't need. I've done enough bad stuff in my life (thank you Kirk and 7-11) that I don't need some jerk telling me I'm going to hell for slapping my salami.
I thought this shit was over, man. But to give the audience credit, when this priest was going off about this, they were pretty much frozen in their seats, not knowing how to react to such nonsense. Yet the "beat" goes on. And I assure you, having once gone over 30 days without any... outlet, for my sinful ways, you don't want a world full of pissed off and horny guys roaming the streets, 'cuz somebody is getting their ass kicked... people get shot like that. Am I off on this or what?
The Hollow Man
Proudly defiling himself since 1989
Now, that being said, I have hit upon some hard times lately and I don't have cable. In fact I have rabbit ears, which many of you born in the late '80's would have no idea about. Anyway, I only get a like 7 stations and one of those is EWTN (Eternal Word Television Network) a product of the Holy Roman Catholic Church.
To give you some back ground, I was born and raised Catholic. I went to Catholic school from 6th to 8th grade and, for the most part, I love the Church for it's history, tradition, and pageantry. Yes I know that it is propagating a fallacy, but you know what, that's OK by me. Most people blow them off when they get really out of line.
Anyway, I was watching this priest tonight who sounded a lot like Sean Connery. This guy went through the ten commandments (fifteen commandments if you have seen History of the World) and sure enough he got to the 6th commandment... Thou shall not commit adultery. And in true off the wall fashion, he included "impure thoughts" masturbation, and of course pre-marital sex as adultery. Guilty, guilty, and guilty. Now, my flock, these are "MORTAL SINS" which pretty much means if you ever saw a hot chick and said "Wow she's hot." or ever beat you meat, or ever shtoinked some chica you are pretty much going to hell unless you go and tell some 40year old virgin about it, ask for forgiveness, and say 30 Hail Mary's.
I can't even imagine that this ideology is still around. I mean, how ridiculous. To think that a natural human characteristic is a sin is baffling to me. This is the kind of shit that pisses me off. Granted, Catholics never tried to blow me up with an IED but this is still some shit I don't need. I've done enough bad stuff in my life (thank you Kirk and 7-11) that I don't need some jerk telling me I'm going to hell for slapping my salami.
I thought this shit was over, man. But to give the audience credit, when this priest was going off about this, they were pretty much frozen in their seats, not knowing how to react to such nonsense. Yet the "beat" goes on. And I assure you, having once gone over 30 days without any... outlet, for my sinful ways, you don't want a world full of pissed off and horny guys roaming the streets, 'cuz somebody is getting their ass kicked... people get shot like that. Am I off on this or what?
The Hollow Man
Proudly defiling himself since 1989
Friday, February 1, 2008
Two in the pink...
Well I have said it before and I will say it again, America is slowly but surely making our way towards oblivion. I have spoken about illegals, terrorists and Islamists and it always seems to fall on deaf ears. People blow me off when I say that I'm not convinced about global warming, they brush me off when I say our legal system is self destructing and they don't believe me when I say there are, no matter how loving and caring you are, there are some people in this world that would just as soon kill you as have dialog with you, even if you are out there supporting their "cause". Please see the Christian peace activists who went to Iraq when I was there who were subsequently captured and either tortured and held captive or tortured and found face down in the Tigris . By the terrorists, not by us thank you very much.
I recently heard of a group that for some reason has flown under my radar as of late. Shame on me for not paying more attention but now that they are in my sights I will be sure to keep up on them. Code Pink is the name of the grou. This group actually gets city funding and spends their time protesting and defacing Marine recruitment centers and the other morning on Fox News said they advocate the assassination of US Marines on sight. On their website Code Pink says "We reject the Bush administration's fear-based politics that justify violence, and instead call for policies based on compassion, kindness and a commitment to international law. With an emphasis on joy and humor, CODEPINK women and men seek to activate, amplify and inspire a community of peacemakers through creative campaigns and a commitment to non-violence"
With an emphasis on joy and humor... I have no words. International relations with an emphasis on joy and humor. They say the Bush administration has fear based politics and let me tell you, if they had seen some of the things I and others who have served have seen, they would be hiding in a closet in the fetal position rocking back and forth saying "There's no place like home. There's no place like home." They don't know what fear is. They don't know what is out there. In fact they are so insane, they actually protested in front of Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco home because the blood of innocents were on her hands and it was "her war". My God... Pelosi just said "You're not my constituents." and walked on. When Nancy Pelosi denounces you for being a Liberal douche you have to be in another realm of being.
The Berkeley City Council this week voted to tell the Marines their downtown recruiting station is not welcome and "if recruiters choose to stay, they do so as uninvited and unwelcome guests," according to The Associated Press.
Are they retarded? Since when does some backwards city council have the right to tell a branch of the federal government they are not welcomed? If indeed they are not welcome then no federal money should be welcomed and to that end, no state funding either since the state also gets federal funding.
I actually find it humorous that this group of insane women (more insane than the rest of them anyway) doesn't support us going over there to help these people out. Let me tell you a little bit about how women are treated in Iraq. In 130 plus degree heat, you will find a man driving a pickup truck with his 5 and 10 year old sons (and oddly enough a dog once), comfortably in the cab with the AC on and his wife, three daughters, and a grandma in a black, head-to-toe burka, in the bed of the truck, bouncing along a bumpy dirt canal road. When I was in the Kuwaiti airport the women, with eyes only exposed, with all seven kids in tow, walked 5 steps behind the men. Women are in fact possessions over there and I would truly enjoy seeing the Code Pink chicks become the property of men. Hell I would have three or four just to do it. I might even convert just so I could.
And now we find out Al Qaida has been using retarded women as suicide bombers (well, more retarded than the rest of them anyway). And I'm not using the word retarded off the cuff, I mean they are literally using women that are mentally retarded as "suicide bombers." "There has to be a limit to the depravity!" You say. NO! you soft, lazy, egocentric American! There isn't! This is even worse then when we saw "suicide bombers" handcuffed to steering wheels, just to find out their families were being held until after they detonated the car bombs. You have no idea what is out there. And as soon as we all recognize the fact that we cannot deal with these people as humans, the sooner we can be safe and get our guys out of there.
At least out of the Democrats Hillary understands what is out there. She may spout bull-shit to appease the Boulder types but when push comes to shove she knows. Obama just frightens me.
So, Code Pink, you call Bush and Rice "war criminals", I say take your plight to Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm sure you will find many sympathetic ears there. Hell I'll even pitch in for your airfare.
I recently heard of a group that for some reason has flown under my radar as of late. Shame on me for not paying more attention but now that they are in my sights I will be sure to keep up on them. Code Pink is the name of the grou. This group actually gets city funding and spends their time protesting and defacing Marine recruitment centers and the other morning on Fox News said they advocate the assassination of US Marines on sight. On their website Code Pink says "We reject the Bush administration's fear-based politics that justify violence, and instead call for policies based on compassion, kindness and a commitment to international law. With an emphasis on joy and humor, CODEPINK women and men seek to activate, amplify and inspire a community of peacemakers through creative campaigns and a commitment to non-violence"
With an emphasis on joy and humor... I have no words. International relations with an emphasis on joy and humor. They say the Bush administration has fear based politics and let me tell you, if they had seen some of the things I and others who have served have seen, they would be hiding in a closet in the fetal position rocking back and forth saying "There's no place like home. There's no place like home." They don't know what fear is. They don't know what is out there. In fact they are so insane, they actually protested in front of Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco home because the blood of innocents were on her hands and it was "her war". My God... Pelosi just said "You're not my constituents." and walked on. When Nancy Pelosi denounces you for being a Liberal douche you have to be in another realm of being.
The Berkeley City Council this week voted to tell the Marines their downtown recruiting station is not welcome and "if recruiters choose to stay, they do so as uninvited and unwelcome guests," according to The Associated Press.
Are they retarded? Since when does some backwards city council have the right to tell a branch of the federal government they are not welcomed? If indeed they are not welcome then no federal money should be welcomed and to that end, no state funding either since the state also gets federal funding.
I actually find it humorous that this group of insane women (more insane than the rest of them anyway) doesn't support us going over there to help these people out. Let me tell you a little bit about how women are treated in Iraq. In 130 plus degree heat, you will find a man driving a pickup truck with his 5 and 10 year old sons (and oddly enough a dog once), comfortably in the cab with the AC on and his wife, three daughters, and a grandma in a black, head-to-toe burka, in the bed of the truck, bouncing along a bumpy dirt canal road. When I was in the Kuwaiti airport the women, with eyes only exposed, with all seven kids in tow, walked 5 steps behind the men. Women are in fact possessions over there and I would truly enjoy seeing the Code Pink chicks become the property of men. Hell I would have three or four just to do it. I might even convert just so I could.
And now we find out Al Qaida has been using retarded women as suicide bombers (well, more retarded than the rest of them anyway). And I'm not using the word retarded off the cuff, I mean they are literally using women that are mentally retarded as "suicide bombers." "There has to be a limit to the depravity!" You say. NO! you soft, lazy, egocentric American! There isn't! This is even worse then when we saw "suicide bombers" handcuffed to steering wheels, just to find out their families were being held until after they detonated the car bombs. You have no idea what is out there. And as soon as we all recognize the fact that we cannot deal with these people as humans, the sooner we can be safe and get our guys out of there.
At least out of the Democrats Hillary understands what is out there. She may spout bull-shit to appease the Boulder types but when push comes to shove she knows. Obama just frightens me.
So, Code Pink, you call Bush and Rice "war criminals", I say take your plight to Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm sure you will find many sympathetic ears there. Hell I'll even pitch in for your airfare.
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
It's not easy being green
OK, so I had a very interesting conversation the other night with some friends of mine and it revolved around politics in general, with an emphasis on the environment. This is how it broke down; One of the people I was talking to cared more about how we were destroying our planet than anything else in the world, and I wasn't convinced. Being that I can't really speak for them in total, I will try my best to give you their side.
Our planet is in dire peril, we are running out of fossil fuels, the ice caps are melting at an alarming rate, there is an alarming amount of CO2 in our atmosphere, our ozone layer in depleted, the "hockey stick" theory of earth's temperature (which is debunked in one of the links at the end of this blog), and we are killing off species left and right. I was also informed that a recent study came out in which 100% (that's right, 100%) of scientists agree that global warming is real.
That's not exactly what I found.
My side is as follows. Humans are incapable, outside of detonating multiple, high-yield nuclear warheads, of messing out our planet in such a short amount of time. The Earth is not some fragile little glass ball floating through the comfort of a nice, soft, downy, space blanket. We have lived through ice ages and thaws, massive catastrophic meteor hits, super-volcano eruptions nearly destroying all life on Earth (please check out the Yellowstone Caldera for more info), earthquakes, tsunamis, and all sorts of mean nasty, and might I add, natural, stuff.
I further assert that in fact the "Green" movement is nothing more than a ploy to gain power and money. Al Gore was a mediocre politician until he furthered the religion of environmentalism and picked himself up a Nobel Prize. On my way to work today I heard yet another in the series of Alstate insurance ads urging us to go with Alstate because of how "Green" they are, books are sold by the millions about the environment, auto-makers make "green cars" that really aren't nearly as green as they would have you believe (Prius), "not-for-profit" organizations bring in hundreds of millions of dollars to save the One-Legged Tazmanian Digging Squirrel, all the while actually stopping us from making the world a better place. Let me explain.
The worse off people can make the environment sound the more money they make. Pure and simple. Greenpeace, one of the most destructive organizations towards the environment known to man, and exists solely by scaring people into giving money to their cause. They do everything they can to stop new nuclear power plants or anything else that would actually help the environment. They claim that they want to end our reliance on oil but in actuality they are trying to stop us from doing anything about it.
Case in point: They claim that nuclear power is dangerous and dirty. They lobby to stop the new construction of nuclear power plants, they send frogmen to disable nuke ships, and they continue with the rhetoric of Nuclear power is the worst form of energy. They also don't want us to use oil based fuels so pretty much they want us to ship our good over seas by wind and sail. In fact nuclear energy is the one of the cleanest forms of energy there is. It's not dangerous either, despite what the environmentalists tell you. They love to bring up Three Mile Island as a great tragedy and failure of nuclear power when in fact not one person died from it. Chernobyl is an example of what happens when a Communist country that can't afford to feed it's people puts Homer Simpson in charge of a reactor. That indeed is the only real example of any major problem in the history of nuclear power.
Much of Europe is indeed powered by nuclear energy yet in America we are continually told it is a bad thing and are prohibited from exploring it as a way to get safe and clean energy. There is another group that benefits from Greenpeace's war against nuke power and that is the oil industry. In fact when you boil it right down, almost everything Greenpeace and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) do jives very well with the oil companies and it would not surprise me if there was money being funneled in from the oil companies to the green groups through back channels. If you drill in ANWAR all of a sudden there is more oil and the price drops. Open a nuke plant and all of a sudden the price of oil drops. Convenient eh?
My friend is convinced that if we stop using oil all will be well. In fact the economic repercussions globally would be devastating. Millions of people from oil execs, tanker sailors, truck drivers, refinery workers, and gas station attendants would be out of the job. My friend brought up a town in Vermont or someplace that started making shoes then the shoe company closed so they started making something else and were successful. To them that meant that the impact of them losing their jobs would be minimal because they would all find something else to do. This is not a town of 5000, this is a global industry of millions where many people spent years in school learning about nothing but oil. The world economy would tumble if you all of a sudden stopped using oil.
Believe me I want nothing more than to not have to use oil anymore but I don't see it happening any time soon. I have never been one to just jump willy-nilly into anything. I love protection of species and the beautiful lands we have here in America. I would love it if people would stop clear cutting the rain forests. But, trying to guilt millions of people into believing some half cocked science is not my style. Here are some resources if you are interested in learning about something other than an "inconvenient truth".
For a brief explanation of the Yellowstone Caldera and what it has done and will do again please see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_Caldera
Take a real look at the Prius
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cars/what-car-nuts-really-think-of-the-prius-hybrid-electric-322186.php?autoplay=true
For a realistic view of the greenhouse effect and global warming please see
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={D7A01AEE-CECF-48F9-A7B3-A675E9C8F39B}
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/aginatur/moregw.htm
http://www.look-to-the-skies.com/global_warming.htm
An interesting set of resources
http://sermons.trbc.org/20070225_11AM.html
Find out why the "hockey stick" is broken
http://www.john-daly.com/hockey/hockey.htm
Our planet is in dire peril, we are running out of fossil fuels, the ice caps are melting at an alarming rate, there is an alarming amount of CO2 in our atmosphere, our ozone layer in depleted, the "hockey stick" theory of earth's temperature (which is debunked in one of the links at the end of this blog), and we are killing off species left and right. I was also informed that a recent study came out in which 100% (that's right, 100%) of scientists agree that global warming is real.
That's not exactly what I found.
My side is as follows. Humans are incapable, outside of detonating multiple, high-yield nuclear warheads, of messing out our planet in such a short amount of time. The Earth is not some fragile little glass ball floating through the comfort of a nice, soft, downy, space blanket. We have lived through ice ages and thaws, massive catastrophic meteor hits, super-volcano eruptions nearly destroying all life on Earth (please check out the Yellowstone Caldera for more info), earthquakes, tsunamis, and all sorts of mean nasty, and might I add, natural, stuff.
I further assert that in fact the "Green" movement is nothing more than a ploy to gain power and money. Al Gore was a mediocre politician until he furthered the religion of environmentalism and picked himself up a Nobel Prize. On my way to work today I heard yet another in the series of Alstate insurance ads urging us to go with Alstate because of how "Green" they are, books are sold by the millions about the environment, auto-makers make "green cars" that really aren't nearly as green as they would have you believe (Prius
The worse off people can make the environment sound the more money they make. Pure and simple. Greenpeace, one of the most destructive organizations towards the environment known to man, and exists solely by scaring people into giving money to their cause. They do everything they can to stop new nuclear power plants or anything else that would actually help the environment. They claim that they want to end our reliance on oil but in actuality they are trying to stop us from doing anything about it.
Case in point: They claim that nuclear power is dangerous and dirty. They lobby to stop the new construction of nuclear power plants, they send frogmen to disable nuke ships, and they continue with the rhetoric of Nuclear power is the worst form of energy. They also don't want us to use oil based fuels so pretty much they want us to ship our good over seas by wind and sail. In fact nuclear energy is the one of the cleanest forms of energy there is. It's not dangerous either, despite what the environmentalists tell you. They love to bring up Three Mile Island as a great tragedy and failure of nuclear power when in fact not one person died from it. Chernobyl is an example of what happens when a Communist country that can't afford to feed it's people puts Homer Simpson in charge of a reactor. That indeed is the only real example of any major problem in the history of nuclear power.
Much of Europe is indeed powered by nuclear energy yet in America we are continually told it is a bad thing and are prohibited from exploring it as a way to get safe and clean energy. There is another group that benefits from Greenpeace's war against nuke power and that is the oil industry. In fact when you boil it right down, almost everything Greenpeace and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) do jives very well with the oil companies and it would not surprise me if there was money being funneled in from the oil companies to the green groups through back channels. If you drill in ANWAR all of a sudden there is more oil and the price drops. Open a nuke plant and all of a sudden the price of oil drops. Convenient eh?
My friend is convinced that if we stop using oil all will be well. In fact the economic repercussions globally would be devastating. Millions of people from oil execs, tanker sailors, truck drivers, refinery workers, and gas station attendants would be out of the job. My friend brought up a town in Vermont or someplace that started making shoes then the shoe company closed so they started making something else and were successful. To them that meant that the impact of them losing their jobs would be minimal because they would all find something else to do. This is not a town of 5000, this is a global industry of millions where many people spent years in school learning about nothing but oil. The world economy would tumble if you all of a sudden stopped using oil.
Believe me I want nothing more than to not have to use oil anymore but I don't see it happening any time soon. I have never been one to just jump willy-nilly into anything. I love protection of species and the beautiful lands we have here in America. I would love it if people would stop clear cutting the rain forests. But, trying to guilt millions of people into believing some half cocked science is not my style. Here are some resources if you are interested in learning about something other than an "inconvenient truth".
For a brief explanation of the Yellowstone Caldera and what it has done and will do again please see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_Caldera
Take a real look at the Prius
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cars/what-car-nuts-really-think-of-the-prius-hybrid-electric-322186.php?autoplay=true
For a realistic view of the greenhouse effect and global warming please see
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={D7A01AEE-CECF-48F9-A7B3-A675E9C8F39B}
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/aginatur/moregw.htm
http://www.look-to-the-skies.com/global_warming.htm
An interesting set of resources
http://sermons.trbc.org/20070225_11AM.html
Find out why the "hockey stick" is broken
http://www.john-daly.com/hockey/hockey.htm
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Rock Pile Smock Pile...
Ok, so here's the deal... the Rockies are going to the World Series and they are THE hottest tickets in town. That being said most of the people fighting it out to be one of the elect to see them play have not been to a Rockies game in the recent past, nor did they know the names of more than one or two players before this fiasco started.
Don't get me wrong. I am very excited for the rockies. I actually have gone to a few games in the past and have enjoyed myself every time (almost). I myself could only name two players before all this too. But I'm not out in LoDo hootin' and hollerin' about how much I love the Rockies and how they are "my boys... WOOOOOOOOOOO!!!"
Now I don't care that this sudden Rockies mania has hit Denver like a ton of bricks, but I have seen this before.
When the Avs came to town they were winning Stanley Cups left and right and Denver, which had only seen the minor-league Grizzlies many many years ago, all of a sudden became this amazing hockey town. Games were sold out, everybody was an expert (Even though I had to explain what a two-line pass was to the idiot next to me at the game who was screaming about how the refs sucked), and the jerseys could be seen on the street from infants to elderly.
Then they started to suck and there went the Jerseys. Now as most of you know I can't stand the Avs so that is all fine and dandy with me but I happen to like the Rockies and I don't want to see the same thing happen although I know it will. If the Rockies don't do well next year people will be like "Torrial-who?" and "Kaz Mats-whaty?"
But whatever. While everybody is busy wearing Rockies shirts (newly bought I might add) to work and school, I will continue to wear my normal clothes, listen to the games on the radio, and avoid LoDo at all costs on game days. And as for the day when the Rockies win the pennant will be safe in my, middle-class, white bread neighborhood while the looters, vandals, and pyromaniacs destroy downtown. It's a Colorado thing... When one of our teams wins a championship we must show our zeal by fucking up our city. What can I say?
Don't get me wrong. I am very excited for the rockies. I actually have gone to a few games in the past and have enjoyed myself every time (almost). I myself could only name two players before all this too. But I'm not out in LoDo hootin' and hollerin' about how much I love the Rockies and how they are "my boys... WOOOOOOOOOOO!!!"
Now I don't care that this sudden Rockies mania has hit Denver like a ton of bricks, but I have seen this before.
When the Avs came to town they were winning Stanley Cups left and right and Denver, which had only seen the minor-league Grizzlies many many years ago, all of a sudden became this amazing hockey town. Games were sold out, everybody was an expert (Even though I had to explain what a two-line pass was to the idiot next to me at the game who was screaming about how the refs sucked), and the jerseys could be seen on the street from infants to elderly.
Then they started to suck and there went the Jerseys. Now as most of you know I can't stand the Avs so that is all fine and dandy with me but I happen to like the Rockies and I don't want to see the same thing happen although I know it will. If the Rockies don't do well next year people will be like "Torrial-who?" and "Kaz Mats-whaty?"
But whatever. While everybody is busy wearing Rockies shirts (newly bought I might add) to work and school, I will continue to wear my normal clothes, listen to the games on the radio, and avoid LoDo at all costs on game days. And as for the day when the Rockies win the pennant will be safe in my, middle-class, white bread neighborhood while the looters, vandals, and pyromaniacs destroy downtown. It's a Colorado thing... When one of our teams wins a championship we must show our zeal by fucking up our city. What can I say?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)